Wednesday, April 27, 2011

facebook discussion: "Satya Sai Baba" of Puttuparthi and his chamatkars

I fully agree with 90% of what have been written but this 90% belongs to just 10% of satya Sai Baba's life. I have never been a fan or follower of satya Sai Baba but still I admire what he has done for the masses. Apart from water, health, electricity etc it includes giving them 'faith'.. a firm believe in a god. And you'll agree faith is a great healer. I look at his numerous magical skills otherwise. In our childhood our parents played lot of tricks on us and later we played those 'magical' tricks on our children and made small balls, coins, pens etc vanish in thin here. We did it not to be-fool our kids but to either amuse them or to lead them to something better. And btw 'rebirth' is yet to be disapproved by science. Regards..
25 April 2011

The issue is.. many more have wealthier trusts. The important thing is what are they doing with that. And well proclaiming himself as GODMAN is part of his shady 10 % I mentioned earlier. Some of his followers are well educated and respected personalities, thus I doubt if education has much to do with it. But lets spread education so that at least some of the superstitions are taken care of.
25 April 2011

Let's not miss wood for the trees. His past is shady, his activities smack of frauds, murders and other crimes. But, may be at a very late stage though, he filled a vacuum in spiritual aspirations of his followers. I grade him higher than many more with similar pasts or presents, Pawar for one, who have equal or more money but no philanthropy. Bill Gates after duping crores by his restrictive trade practices donates a fraction of his wealth and is lauded. Lets give devil his due. At least on his last journey. Amen
26 April 2011

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

facebook discussion: Badalta Bharat: Adhunikta banam Vikas

There are two issues here. Aadhunikta and social values.
Aadhunikta is just being in sync with today. Sending emails and SMS to announce birth of your child instead of sending letters by post, using computers in place of type writers, driving cars ipo bail-gaadi, using plates ipo pattals, using piped gas ipo gobar ke uple etc is being modern. These are aadhunik cheezen. Use them and be contemporary or don’t use them and be out of sync with today’s world.
And social values are Kaal-Desh specific. One social value may not be relevant at a different place at the same time or at the same place at different times. And in society one may choose to be one with social values or at confrontation with the same.
As far as kissing one’s wife in public is concerned I feel it has got nothing to do with modernity or aadhunikta. It is more a matter of social values. Some societies have adopted it in their values as neatly highlighted by Sachinji others have not. Today our society does not permit it. One has to stop somewhere. From not even walking together in public to just moving together to holding hands in public to kissing in public to… what next…. Members of the society set their limits. I love my wife… I need not make it a matter of public display… yet I am ready to kiss her in public.. Is my samaj ready to accept it? Are you ready?
25 April 2011

I feel modernity is just a change or departure from recent past. It is comparative by means of time and progress not necessarily by means of thoughts. I consider it different from open-ness of
mind. Do we mean that the society has been most open and forward looking today than it was 2 years ago, 200 years ago or 2000 years ago. I refuse to accept that society as depicted in Shakuntalam, in Ramayan and Mahabharat, in various other books of past was comparatively narrow minded than it is today.I feel it was as open or perhaps more open to new ideas then than it is now. Being traditional ie not being modern does not necessarily mean being less open-minded. Bhai I would still walk a mile to eat a chulhe ki roti and I can vouch for it some of them living in far flung villages away from electricity and cell phones are more open minded in their approach than most of us living in our so called modern cities.
25 April 2011

Monday, April 25, 2011

facebook discussion: Medical Tests Before Marriage

A suggestion in facebook by a member:
"...... on medical check-up of the boy and girl before their marriage, specially in context of possibility of transfer of genes. If medical check-up be done before marriage, the possibility of Thalassemia, Haemophilia, Celiac or Hemoglobinopathy will be known to us. Henceforth, the prevention can be done.Aids and other hereditary diseases can be prevented by just a simple blood test of the couple before their marriage. After a certain period of time it becomes impossible to cure hereditary diseases. So its better to avoid marriage of a couple who have presence of a same gene. Many problems can be avoided by just checking the RH factor of the couple. The children of the couple where girl is RH negative and boy is RH positive, are found with big ailments.
The only solution to prevent /stop diseases like Thalassemia is medical check-up of the couple before their marriage. Actually, there are 23 pairs or 46 chromosomes in one body. If one gene is defected/abnormal, then the other genes of the couple cover this problem. This gene is called as regressive and the patient is called as silent carrier. If both the husband and wife are silent cariers, there is a 25% possibility of Thalassemia in their child.
We can avoid such problems/diseases by medical check-up of the couple before marriage. Hereditary problems are leading to a long list of diabetic and cancer patients today. Doctors believe, if the couple have any gene of such hereditary diseases, there is a great possibility of their children being born patients."


A thought provoking issue. Generally one can see that though we all agree on the importance of such a test the point of contention is -how to go about it. Some of our brothers & sisters have raised some very reasonable issues from ethics to social values....... I just discussed the issue with a Medical Officer and he has informed that this genetic disorder is permanent. Like a blood group it also remains the same throughout one's life.... And here lies the solution. One can get his or her children tested at any stage, even when they are in school years before any talk of their marriage. And subsequently at later stage we can match this report just like we match the gotra at initial stage itself before further talks between two families. I think it will address all embarrassments and other ethical issues. Regards....
24 April 2011

facebook discussion: LOVE MARRIAGE या ARRANGED MARRIAGE

I don’t see any marriage without an arrangement. Two strangers meeting by the road side do not get married instantly. Either it is arranged by the families of the two by checking various compatibility factors or is arranged by just the two of them on a single factor of LOVE between the two. As I see it both are two different versions of arranged marriages. One arranged by experts and other by novices.
Both can succeed or fail. But a prototype developed by experts has greater probability of succeeding over the one developed by amateurs, I suppose.
24 April 2011

Friday, February 18, 2011

Drinking: Where does it stand in the books of religion?


Satbir Singh posted on his wall on facebook today:
Peene Ki Aadat Thi Mujhe,
Usne Apni Kasam De Kar Chhuda Di,
Baitha tha Mehfil Main Yaroon ki,
Aur Yaaron Ne Uski Kasam Dekar Pila Di 


I commented
Tabhi to Ghalib ne kaha tha 'Ghalib chhuti sharab to lekin kabhi kabhie'. 

More comments are pouring in but the couplet set the ball rolling and made me ponder, “Where does drinking stand in the books of religion and spiritualism”? As we see it most of.. rather almost all the religious books have something to say against drinking. All those religious books say that one should not drink.. that it is 'sin' to drink.. it is paap. Whereas most intellectuals have a different take on it. Ghalib's shayari, Bachchanji's 'Madhushala' are just a few of many examples.

But is there really something against drinking in the original scriptures? Here I consider these religious books different from the scriptures. Scriptures are the real and authentic compilations of very basics of a particular religion and these 'religious books' are the guidelines, do's & don'ts based on the understanding of those scriptures. So basically, or scripturally, is any religion really against drinking?

I find drinking or non-drinking is not really an issue with any religion. No religion actually prohibits or promotes drinking or use of other drugs or intoxicants like tobacco or even 'afeem', 'bhang' etc. In fact why it should? An intoxicant for one could be a medicine for other. Even for same person different quantities of same drug or syrup could mean different things under different conditions. One spoonful of an expectorant is medicine, two is an overdose and more could even be fatal. It is said that even wheat has intoxicant effects... one might remember Sany Kabir's couplet:
'Kanak Kanak te sou guni maadakta adhikaye,
ek khay bauraat jan, ek paaye bauraay'

So how would any religion differentiate and quantify something as a life saving medicine or as a mere drink or as a narcotic drug and intoxicant. And also why would any religion get involved in such nitty gritty. Even simple food can make one feel sleepy at a particular time during the day. To quantify the dose universally is not an easy task and, as stated earlier, not the real issue with any religion. Bhagwan Mahesh or Shiva is known to use all these different Som Rasa's and regularly consume all sort of intoxicants like Bhang etc. So why would he stop his followers from using the same?

We can very easily see that no religious scripture actually prohibits consumption of intoxicants. What any religion really warns against is 'getting drunk'. And actually that's the real matter of concern. Drinking is not considered bad, only getting drunk is. Loosing one's senses is bad. And though almost everything has its quantity of intoxicants in it, the degree varies from one item to another. From water to milk to tea to beer to rum etc the degree of getting drunk differs, quantity of drink remaining the same. Many a medicinal syrups have alcohol. Using all these drugs and many other such things can not be bad as long as it improves one's health and well being or atleast does not adversly affect one's health, finances or senses. If one loses all one's senses even after a glass of milk then even that glass of milk is not good and will fall under the prohibited category.

But yes intoxicating effects of certain items like alcohol, narcotics etc spread much faster and can even be fatal if not controlled. It requires a very high degree of discipline and control to stay within the limits. Such items are included in religious books and guidelines under prohibited category. It is not simply drinking which is feared... mere drinking is no vice.. but the real fear is that uncontrolled it may make one lose one's senses, lose his powers of discretion, 'vivek'. And in that condition one might not be in a position, albeit temporarily, to distinguish between a good act and a bad and may actually committ an act by body or by mind which might be sinful and, in which one would not have got involved under one's full senses.

Drinking alcohol in itself is not a sin- nor even a dangerous thing but only as long as it is within limits. But only a small quantity of it comes within the category of limit. It is very easy to cross limits with an alcoholic drink. And when the limit is crossed then the faculty that is affected the most is our power of discretion- our 'vivek'. And when 'vivek' is gone one may actually committ a sinful act which one might not have committed otherwise.

So cheers all ye tipplers. No problems with drinking... just be careful of getting drunk...

Saturday, January 29, 2011

Republic Day: Is it "An Unnecessary Ritual"?




    




As we celebrated our Republic Day this year and as I went through those numerous greetings in person, on phone, through SMSs, facebook and twitter etc, I was reminded of an article in the Times Of India some time back written by Commodore C. Udaya Bhaskar titled “An Unnecessary Ritual”. In this lead article Cdr Bhaskar had argued that we need to review the relevance of Republic Day Parade. Cdr Bhaskar is of the opinion that this parade has outlived its utility and that ‘clinging to a tradition where the symbolism becomes an inflexible ritual, and the spectacle masks the glaring inadequacies of the state ought to be dispassionately reviewed’. To support his argument Cdr Bhaskar has cited many reasons including –Delhi’s babudom coming to a halt for almost a month, -the frustration of commuters and irate motorists due to traffic diversion, -the considerable resources expended annually, -acute anxiety about terrorist attacks and VIP security.. etc, etc.

On Republic Day this year I thought about it. Do we really need to stop celebrating the Republic Day as we do it today? Has it actually lost its relevance? Is it really wastage of resources –men and material? Is the frustration of motorists or the fears of terrorist attacks reasons enough to bid good bye to these festivities? I beg to differ. Yes it is a predominantly military symbolism but then have we reached a stage where we can do away with our military? I think more than ever we need a strong military now. Not so much during the days of colonialism, not so during the early days of the consolidation stage as we need a strong military today. So first and foremost we shall see whether we need military, - a strong military at that- or no. If we don’t need any military then well we won’t bid for a military parade too. But if there is smallest justification for having our own strong military then well I see no reason as to why we should stop that traditional way of celebrating the Republic Day with that ‘predominantly military symbolism’. And as Cdr Bhaskar has mentioned himself, -the composition of the parade has already changed to reflect both the military and the developmental profile of the Indian State.
So where do we stand on the question of the need of a strong military? Events in Iraq and Afghanistan, -threats to Iran and North Korea, -military intervention in many Afrikan states, -withering away of USSR, -developments in Pakistan etc, etc are that many reasons for us NOT TO DO AWAY with our military power in haste. These are perhaps sufficient reasons to have a strong military profile. And yes if we have a military then let’s give it a day to showcase its teeth and skills… or the symbolic power if not exactly the teeth and skills. So Cdr Bhaskars’s argument about the military or military symbolism having outlived its utility does not hold ground here.
And now, in front of this requirement, all the other reasons put forward by Cdr Uday Bhaskar, a retired officer from the Indian Navy, a renowned defence analyst, surprise me having been published under his signatures in a newspaper of national repute ‘The Times Of India’. Shall we stop celebrating our National Day just because we have not been able to manage our affairs elsewhere? Just because the babudom at Delhi comes to a halt for almost a month shall we adopt the escapist route of withholding the parade itself rather than motivating the babudom not to ‘come to a halt’? Shall we stop the parade or mend our ways and retrospect why babudom comes to a standstill? Why does the commuter suffer if there is a parade once in a year on our National Day? Is there anything else that can be done without stopping the parade? Can we otherwise improve the traffic conditions so that a diversion to celebrate our National Day does not ‘frustrate’ the commuters and ‘irate’ motorists? Is it really a wastage of considerable human and material resources? Shall we then stop all celebrations in life? Does it have no positives? Does no body –no civilian –no Indian at heart, wants to watch it?
I feel it is not the kind of situation as Cdr Bhaskar has painted. Yes there is ample scope for improvement and maybe we can add more non-military developmental aspects but it has to have that military symbolism for it to be a different and special type of a celebration. More than the nation, I feel, Commodore C. Uday Bhaskar needs to review his views about the Republic Day Parade. Lets celebrate ‘our’ Day with more enthusiasm and interest than ever.
Jai Hind .. 

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

Gurjars: Their Origin and History



There are almost as many theories about the origin of Gurjars as there are writers who have done any research in this matter. Just about any research, deep or superficial. Every original writer differs from every other on one count or the other. Here I would like to recollect all that I have gathered about the origin of Gurjars. My source of this view is partially what has been written in some of the books and a part is arrived at by filling the missing links showing what would have happened in the past.

Gurjar history dates back to more than three thousand years. How much more than this can not be said with certainty. The reason is not that we don't have any historical records of their origin or early period but that their evolution was so gradual that one couldn't feel the transition immediately. So it is almost impossible to fix a particular date for their origin. It is a principle, a way of living, a culture which makes one a Gurjar. It is not a religion and nor does religion bind it. There are Gurjars who are Hindus and there are Gurjars who are Muslims, Sikhs or Jains etc etc.
There is no solid base behind the theory that the Gurjars migrated from China, Central Asia or some other far off place into India. There might have been people in India who were Gurjars but their forefathers came into India from other parts of the world including China and Central Asia, but it is not true that Gurjars originated in Central Asia or some other part of the world and from there they came to India. Rather the vice versa is very much possible that though they originated in India, later many of them moved to other parts of the world and took Gurjar culture elsewhere. Huns and other such tribes entered India as migrant tribes having different physical attributes and some of these migrant clans became Hinduised and adopted Gurjar culture and thus came to be known as Gurjars thereafter. In this way we can see that though Hun and Kushana tribes adopted Gurjar culture, not all Huns and Kushans might have become Gurjars. At least they might not have been Gurjars from initial stage in their history wherever they might have been, be it in China, Central Asia or elsewhere. It was just like samrat Ashok getting influenced and then adopting Buddhist way of life

Gurjars as a distinct culture originated in the north-western part of Indian Sub-continent, along the plains of Indus, Satluj and now extinct Saraswati Rivers covering parts of present day Rajasthan and Punjab, on both sides of border ie India and Pakistan. It did not start as a different religious or other ethnic group but as a culture and as followers of certain principles set-out mutually in the larger interests of the individuals, the society and the country they belonged to. These were the principles laid down to be followed by everyone who wanted to be a part of that culture. The language they used was derived from Sanskrit and is known as Gurjari, Gujjari or Gojri language. It is considered to be mother of many a North Indian languages.

There was no religious bondage. In fact at that time outlook towards religion was philosophical and not fundamentalist. All those people who adopted that system gradually became an identity distinct from rest of the people and started commanding respect from others. As the culture was a refined system, it influenced more and more people and they took this system to even far off places by migrating to those places from the land of their origin.

Some of the kings, especially the ones who entered India and established their kingdoms here, and followed this exclusive way of life, ruled states small or big and at the same time many other rulers adopted it when they came in contact with this culture. Later on the off-springs of those families who ruled a state at one time or the other started calling themselves Rajputs irrespective of whether they further got to rule or not.

It was during the Moghul and the British period that the followers of this culture could no longer hold on to the glorious past and during this period degradation took place as their followers, true to their principles and ethics, opposed the foreign powers but lost in their war and thus lost all the favours of the government as well. They were always an irritant to invaders who came from outside of India. They very strongly and openly opposed the English power but by that time, being out of power for almost 700 years and being in constant war with their mighty opponents, they had lost most of their power so though they continued to oppose the British power, they did not meet with great success. And in the bargain got worst of both, the political and economical progress.

Gurjars very actively took part in first war of independence in 1857 and had risen up in rebellion against British power. As the British Imperialist power succeeded in suppressing the uprising, they started witch hunt and targeted the Gurjar community, amongst others, being most active against the Raj. Subsequently Britishers acted very vindictively and displaced many Gurjars and uprooted many Gurjar villages, my village Chandrawal being one such village, confiscated many movable and immovable properties, hounded and killed many young and old male members of the community and banned all recruitment of Gurjars in government services. This was enough to deprive Gurjars of their rightful due. They were not in a position to fully put to use their talent and energy and thus this lack of avenues, aided by frustration on being neglected by the government led them to other acts like robbery and dacoity against the British government as well as those people within or outside their groups who supported government and its oppressive policies.

This transformation from 'noble-people' to rebellious ones did not come out instantly. It took hundreds of years. Thankfully it is over now and community is now on its way to restore its past glory and with fast all-round development, aided by a sincere and conscious effort, it will surely not take that long but a far far short time for the community to regain and relive its past glory.